15 Institutions Announce the Launch of Stablecoins Over 30 Days! Will This Introduce a New Cryptocurrency Bubble?

Interest in stablecoins peaked in September, but will the trend continue? Stablecoins are not exempt from the “impossible trinity” theory of currency, and the question remains: will they too become a bubble?

Interest in stablecoins peaked in September, but will the trend continue? Stablecoins are not exempt from the “impossible trinity” theory of currency, and the question remains: will they too become a bubble?

Recently, stablecoins showed explosive growth with 15 institutions announcing the launch of stablecoins over the past 30 days. At the beginning of September, four major exchanges in China and South Korea jointly funded the Terra Stablecoin project, which launched what they called “Stablecoin Month”. Cryptocurrency exchanges, blockchain companies, financial companies, and even banks started issuing stablecoins. Among them, two stablecoins were “endorsed” by regulatory authorities, namely Gemini Dollar (GUSD) and Paxos (PAX).

According to Xcong, 15 institutions announced the launch of 13 stablecoins in September:

Launched/Declared on Stablecoin Name Abbreviation Linked Assets Issuer Region Remarks
September 29 LBXPeg GBP London Block Exchange (LBX) England
September 29 Kinesis Velocity Token KVT Gold and silver Hyperion Exchange regulated by the US Securities and Exchange Commission US
September 28 Dukasnotes TBD Dukascopy, regulated Swiss bank Swiss
September 26 USD//Coin USDC USD Circle, a cryptocurrency platform invested by Goldman Sachs US
September 26 AUDF AUD Blockchain Global, a multinational blockchain company Australia Expected to be launched in October
September 26 AUD Exchange: Bit Trade, Blockchain employment platform: Emparta Australia Expected to be launched next year
September 19 ekon Gold Eidoo, a blockchain start-up in Swiss Swiss
September 18 JPY SHIS LTD Hong Kong, China Expected to be launched at the end of this year or at the beginning of 2019
September 18 Wealth in Token WIT Offshore RMB CITIC International Assets Management Limited and Galaxy Digital Assets Management Company Limited China WIT uses offshore RMB as the settlement standard
September 12 CarbonUSD USD Carbon, a cryptocurrency project A stablecoin based on Ethereum
September 10 Paxos Standard token PAX USD Paxos, a blockchain start-up US Approved by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)
September 10 Gemini Dollar GUSD USD Gemini Trust, a cryptocurrency company US Approved by the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)
September 3 Terra Tmon, the second largest e-commerce company in South Korea South Korea Joint investment by four major exchanges in China and South Korea for a total of $32 million USD.

Most of the stablecoins above are linked to the US dollar, while some are linked to offshore RMB, the Japanese yen, the Australian dollar, the British pound, and gold.

Screen Shot 2018-10-12 at 2.27.15 PM.png

According to the blockchain data company Blockchain Global, there will be as many as 57 stablecoins in the future. The market demand for stablecoins seems to be increasing, but opponents pointed out that stablecoins may drive the next cryptocurrency bubble.

Whale Panda, a well-known cryptocurrency commentator, said via Twitter that stablecoins are a bubble.

Screen Shot 2018-10-12 at 2.30.04 PM.png

Some netizens commented on Weibo that the vast majority of stablecoins are of no practical significance; stablecoins are just a medium of exchange. These stablecoins cannot compete with Tether (USDT) in terms of function, and their trading volumes are poor. A trader only cares whether he can buy enough Bitcoins with these stablecoins. Zhao Dong, the founder of DFUND, agreed with this opinion on Weibo.

Screen Shot 2018-10-12 at 2.28.34 PM.png


At present and in the future, the vast majority of stablecoins will be of no practical significance. Stablecoins will not be more stable than the legal tenders they are anchored to. The role of stablecoins is simply a medium for trading digital currency.

The reason why USDT is widely used is because it is based on the premise that the spot trading volume of BFX comes first. Holding USDT always gets the deepest spot trading in the market, which is impossible for all other stablecoins. Some people think that a stablecoin can support an exchange, which is a complete mix up of the causal relationship.

A trader only cares whether he can buy enough Bitcoins with these stablecoins. Other coins like TUSD, GUSD, BitCNY, etc., no matter how valuable, safe, and ‘stable’ they are, have trading volumes far less than Bitcoin, and they cannot be used directly even if I did get them. This is because they must be exchanged to USDT or legal tender first. This is the only role of these coins.”)

In addition, Zhao Dong recently said in WeChat Moments that stablecoin is a “pseudo-proposition,” and mentioned the “impossible trinity” theory of currency.

Screen Shot 2018-10-12 at 2.31.29 PM.png

(“Views on stablecoins:

There is an ‘impossible trinity’ theory in currency. In 1999, Paul Krugman proposed the USDT, the success of which relied on abandoning the independence of monetary policy by handing it over to the bank, with the aim of achieving high liquidity and anchoring to the ‘stability’ of the US dollar. At this point, the USDT has basically done it. GUSD learned from USDT, but it’s still unknown whether it can also achieve success.

What about other so-called ‘stabilized coins’? If you want to be independent and stable then you must give up liquidity. However, you cannot move freely. If there is no liquidity in the stablecoin, do you still need it? I don’t.

Therefore, if you want to be independent and have liquidity, you must give up stability. Thus, the stablecoin becomes a ‘pseudo-proposition’ and does not exist.”)

An article from Cryptovest points out that a stablecoin usually faces a big problem even if it is endorsed by the regulator and is fully compliant; namely, it needs to abide by the rules of the bank, which completely violates the concept that the value transfer should be unrestricted. In order to remain a fully compliant stablecoin, the user’s account and transaction size will be limited.

Cryptovest said that if the original intention of cryptocurrency was to let people master the autonomy of wealth and eliminate third-party institutions like banks, then the emergence of stablecoins is a step backwards.

While being questioned, many institutions and commentators have affirmed the value of stablecoins. After issuing USDC, Jeremy Allaire, CEO of Circle, talked about the new dynamics of the stablecoin industry:

“Blockchain infrastructure does require a token model based on legal tender. From tokenized bonds to securities and investment contract lending to tokenized property – everything is very powerful.”

According to the analysis of Forbes, senior VCs (including a16z and Sequoia Capital) have invested millions of US dollars in decentralized agreements and applications. In theory, stablecoins can solve the liquidity problem, and users can exchange their own funds into stablecoins and exchange them to the required tokens at any time, instead of holding dozens of different tokens in multiple wallets. At the same time, there are no price volatility issues with stablecoins.

Forbes believes that the long-term potential of stablecoins and their wallets is to become a new type of retail bank, which is one reason why investment institutions are optimistic about it.

(Source: https://xcong.com/articles/3414389)

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: